About PEMBlogNewsResourcesContact Us
News & Events

Parents for Ethical Marketing
is a young, grassroots organization of people concerned about the effects of corporate marketing practices directed at young children.

Members receive action alerts and a monthly e-newsletter.

Learn More...

News & Events

Virgin Mobile Pulls Back Racy Campaign

Decides it probably wasn't the best idea to encourage kids to strip on YouTube . . . no matter what the cause.

Read More...

 

Game publishers turning more to girl gamers

Think pink! And puppies! And princesses!

Read More...

 

Study Finds Materialism in Children and Adolescents Linked to Self-Esteem

From the Journal of Consumer Research

Read More...

 

McDonald's Wants to Clear Its Food Rep

New campaign addresses quality of menu items

Read More...

 

Is it a corporations's right to advertise in public schools?

Research looks at First Amendment implications of restricting marketing in schools.

Read More...

Safer products for Minnesota’s children? Governor Pawlenty doesn’t think so.

Guest blogger Katie Rojas-Jahn is the program assistant for the Food and Health program at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy (IATP) and for the Healthy Legacy Coalition.

With so many products available to consumers today, how do we know that what we’re buying is safe? Most of us assume that products have been tested by someone, somewhere along the way, to make sure they won’t cause us harm.

Unfortunately, that’s not the case for many of the consumer products on the shelf today. 

ducks.jpg

The reason is that most chemicals used in consumer goods don’t have to be tested for their safety and the federal government is often unwilling or unable to take action to prevent harm before it happens.

The 2008 legislative session provided an important opportunity to address product safety at the Minnesota Legislature. More than two-thirds of the legislature supported a bill that would have made homes across the state a little bit safer.

But as it turns out, eliminating toxic chemicals from consumer products was not a high priority on the list for Governor Tim Pawlenty, who, despite strong bi-partisan support, vetoed the bill once it reached his desk.

The Public Health Omnibus bill (SF651) contained two provisions important to protecting children’s health. The bill would have phased out phthalates, a hormone-disrupting chemical contained in PVC plastic and countless other children’s products: rubber duckies, vinyl bibs, teething rings, and more. The second provision would have eliminated a toxic flame retardant, known as “deca,” from home electronics, mattresses, and textiles.

Both of these chemicals can be harmful to health, especially to children.

Phthalates are known hormone disrupters and have been linked to adverse health effects, including reproductive problems, the early onset of puberty in girls, and disruption to the male reproductive tract.

Deca is a developmental neurotoxin that is chemically similar to another group of harmful chemicals banned in the 1970s: PCBs. Exposure to deca in low doses has been linked to brain, liver and thyroid damage as well as hormone disruption.

Who would have thought that phasing out chemicals that can cause adverse effects would be such a challenge? Representatives from the American Chemistry Council, the Toy Industry Association, and the Bromine Science and Environmental Forum — all representing large chemical and manufacturing companies — were a continuous presence at hearings for the Minnesota bill to make sure that it was.

In fact, the opposition lobby was so strong that the bill’s phthalates phase-out originally included the chemical bisphenol-A (BPA), another hormone disruptor found in baby bottles and sippy cups.  Despite overwhelming public support, BPA was later stricken from the bill in hopes of making it more palatable for the Governor Pawlenty.

The chemical industry took on the same tactics as the tobacco companies did in the 1990s: they created a sense of “manufactured uncertainty” around the science. In other words, they made their own science, didn’t have it reviewed by other scientists, and guess what? Their science shows no health effects from exposure to these chemicals.

For example, the graph below shows a review of the low dose literature on exposure to BPA as of October 2006… I’ll let the table speak for itself.

chart.jpg

Even though the vast majority of studies have shown BPA to cause harmful effects in lab animals in low doses, the chemical industry continues to play the game of casting doubt on the science in order to keep their products in high demand.

Despite well-funded opposition from industry and a veto from Governor Pawlenty, a two-thirds plus majority of members in the Minnesota House and Senate voted for the Public Health Omnibus bill.

I encourage Minnesota readers to contact their representatives and senators and either thank them for their support, or ask them to support similar legislation next year.  To obtain contact information for your Minnesota Representative and/or Senator, visit the “Who Represents Me?” portion of the Minnesota Legislature website.

Despite the Governor’s veto, we will back next year with even more tenacity and support. These bills were supported by Healthy Legacy, a Minnesota-based coalition of 29 diverse groups who are dedicated to safe products, made safely.

Healthy Products for Minnesota Kids: Safer Children’s Products
Smart Plastics Guide

Read also: Pawlenty vetoes safe toy legislation but isn’t sure why

Image courtesy Gaetan Lee

Leave a Reply