About PEMBlogNewsResourcesContact Us
News & Events

Parents for Ethical Marketing
is a young, grassroots organization of people concerned about the effects of corporate marketing practices directed at young children.

Members receive action alerts and a monthly e-newsletter.

Learn More...

News & Events

Virgin Mobile Pulls Back Racy Campaign

Decides it probably wasn't the best idea to encourage kids to strip on YouTube . . . no matter what the cause.

Read More...

 

Game publishers turning more to girl gamers

Think pink! And puppies! And princesses!

Read More...

 

Study Finds Materialism in Children and Adolescents Linked to Self-Esteem

From the Journal of Consumer Research

Read More...

 

Ads on children's social networking sites

Harmless child's play or virtual insanity?

Read More...

 

Pepsi and Coke to reform marketing efforts to kids (maybe)

Plenty of wiggle room under new guidelines.

Read More...

Archive for the ‘Retailers’ Category

At summer camp, girls learn to shop for self-confidence, excel at “posing”

Monday, June 23rd, 2008

Asthma Mom looks at a summer “Fashion Camp” held at a Louisville mall in Teaching Young Girls How to Shop. For Self-Confidence.

The camp coordinator says that while the camp “has a fashion background . . . it also has to do with personal development and self-confidence.”

The personal development must come from these activities:

lessons in modeling and posing;
learning fashion terminology;
putting together and accessorizing outfits;
understanding the importance of thank-you notes (courtesy Hallmark); and
standing up in front of the class and describing fashion choices.

The youngest camp attendees (ages 6 to 8) can join in on the fun with these sessions:

Let’s Play Fashion Seek and Find! (courtesy J. Crew);
Let’s Accessorize a Dress! and
What Do I Need To Do to Keep My Skin Pretty?

lady.jpg

I suppose an argument could be made for the merits of teaching girls to present themselves in an appropriate manner. That argument would work well in, say, the 1800s. But not today, when we know that the marketing-body-image-consumerism cycle is actually detrimental to girls:

. . . The “quick-fix” of a purchase actually robs [girls] of self-determination, self-awareness, and self-esteem. Encouraged to look outside of themselves for comfort, values and direction, girls become easy prey to addictive behaviors and unrealistic images . . . . In fact, the diet, tobacco and alcohol industries target girls, capitalizing on the body image, weight concerns, and beauty ideals that make them most vulnerable.

And let’s face it: this camp exists only to encourage girls to become shoppers at this neighborhood mall.

“As far as we know, this is the only program of its kind in the country,” says the camp coordinator.

Amen.

Read more: I Want, Therefore I Am: Global Girls in Consumer Culture

Target’s blogger-relations fiasco is now a lesson in social media for big marketers

Thursday, June 19th, 2008

Joseph Jaffe of Jaffe Juice uses the “snow-angel” ad and Target’s response to blogger Amy Jussel as an example of a major social media mistake.

Watch Social Media Mistakes of Five Big Marketers. Target is featured beginning around 4:30.

Jaffe also acknowledges the colossal mistakes of Sprint, Sony, T-Mobile, and Starbucks.

From AdAge:

Nothing aggravates blogger Joseph Jaffe more than marketers that employ fakery, manipulation and heavy-handed lawyers in their social-media interactions with consumers. Author of the books “Life After the 30-Second Spot” and “Join the Conversation,” Jaffe is the head of the marketing consulting company Crayon. He also runs the blog JaffeJuice, which is No. 26 on Ad Age’s Power 150 ranking of the top media and marketing blogs. This video contains eight minutes of his remarks at the recent Association of National Advertisers’ Integrated Marketing Conference.

I guess Mom was right, no one likes a complainer

Tuesday, March 25th, 2008

Receiving an actual response from Procter & Gamble reminds me of the all the organizations I haven’t heard back from. Here’s an update of recent past efforts:

Nationwide Children’s Hospital (re: Abercrombie & Fitch naming rights): nothin’
Girl Scouts of America (re: affiliation with Unilever/Axe): nada
HarperCollins (re: publishing Mackenzie Blue): zero
Target (re: snow angel): zilch
Motion Picture Association of America (on ads for PG-13 movies): *crickets*

Commerical Alert offers us another chance to contact HarperCollins and let them know we’re not so thrilled with their new product-placement/advertising-filled books for tween girls by Tina “parents are tweenabees” Wells.

Unrelated: I did hear back from Northwest Airlines after I filed a complaint on their website. They gave me 5,000 miles, too. Now if they can just get me to Boston on time.

Call to action: Add your voice to Abercrombie & Fitch children’s hospital debate

Thursday, March 13th, 2008

Tell Nationwide Children’s Hospital: No Naming Rights For Abercrombie & Fitch

Children’s hospital not “selling” naming rights, just naming new trauma center after the company that donated $10 mil

Wednesday, March 12th, 2008

RE: the Abercrombie & Fitch children’s hospital wing: We learn from today’s New York Times article that there is a difference between selling naming rights and naming something after a corporation that donates to you.

Uh-huh.

We also learn that the lobby of the new Nationwide Children’s Hospital Emergency Department and Trauma Center will be named after Limited Too and Justice retail chains.

Interesting.

The Consumerist illustrates what the new hospital wing might look like, as does Reality Rant.

Commenters? Before writing with creative suggestions on relocating my family to South Korea, please take five minutes to read the reasoning behind the request for the hospital to reconsider the name of the new wing. Thanks.

Related posts:
Sexy Teen Retailer Bad, Lead Toy Maker Good
Abercrombie Name Should Not Be on Children’s ER
Abercrombie Presents the Hottest Emergency Room for Children Ever (Hey, Gawker, if you’re going to reference my post):

. . . . judging by a 2006 Salon profile of the company they are probably right. In it, Abercrombie CEO Mike Jeffries defended thongs for middle school girls, which had been imprinted with statements like “Eye Candy” and “Wink Wink,” by saying “You know what? I still think those are cute underwear for little girls. And I think anybody who gets on a bandwagon about thongs for little girls is crazy.” . . .  After the jump, an outraged anti-Abercrombie letter signed by 16 “advocacy organizations” and “about 800 Ph. D.’s,” according to one of the signatories.

why not share the link?

BREAKING: Children’s hospital naming rights go to . . . Abercrombie & Fitch?

Tuesday, March 11th, 2008

Nationwide Children’s Hospital in Columbus, Ohio is considering giving naming rights for its new emergency department to Abercrombie & Fitch.

You read that right.

You know, a hospital? Where they care about children’s health? A lot? And you know, Abercrombie ’n’ Fitch? Where they don’t so much?

See, in the Abercrombie ’n’ Fitch world, the sexualization of young girls leads to fun, fun, more fun, and then, happiness! And not to depression, eating disorders, and sexual problems when they become adults.

You may remember the A ‘n’ F little-girl-thong fiasco? CEO Mike Jeffries, in a Salon interview, says he thinks that the thongs made for middle-school girls with “Wink Wink” and “Eye Candy” printed on them were “cute!”

“People said we were cynical, that we were sexualizing little girls. But you know what? I still think those are cute underwear for little girls. And I think anybody who gets on a bandwagon about thongs for little girls is crazy. . . . ”

Ohhhhh-kay. The interview continues:

. . . . when I ask him how important sex and sexual attraction are in what he calls the “emotional experience” he creates for his customers, he says, “It’s almost everything. That’s why we hire good-looking people in our stores. Because good-looking people attract other good-looking people, and we want to market to cool, good-looking people. We don’t market to anyone other than that.”

 I wonder it that would go for the children’s emergency room, too.

nrse.jpg

Parents for Ethical Marketing, along with 15 other advocacy organizations and about 800 Ph.D.s have signed on to a CCFC letter asking Nationwide Children’s Hospital not to sell the naming rights to Abercrombie ’n’ Fitch.

Information on where to sign on to the request will follow.

Related from Bob Garfield: Abercrombie Underwear Shop Plays Up Goods, But Not Its Own

Another overreaction from a humorless mother

Sunday, March 2nd, 2008

Feministing called out t-shirt maker David and Goliath (no link) for selling a shirt that says:

No means no. Well, maybe if I’m drunk.

David and Goliath pulled the shirt from their website and replaced it with a special discounted shirt for Feministing readers:

Miss Bitch

David and Goliath also has an adult t-shirt section where I found this gem:

21.jpg

Where is this going to end?

Sitter’s Checklist: Toy safety extravaganza

Wednesday, February 20th, 2008

Call to action: Tell your senators to vote “yes” on the CPSC Reform Act. (via Consumer’s Union)

Stepped-up safety guidelines from Toys R Us. Authentic? We’ll see.

Chicago Tribune wins George Polk Award for consumer reporting on toy safety. We linked to these articles in a previous Sitter’s Checklist. (via Daddy Types)

“Disney Princess” and RECALL in the same sentence: and it’s not even my birthday! Bonus: “Made in China” and “sold at Wal-Mart.” Fire and burn hazard.

cindycar.jpg